Switching to Semi-annual Financial Statement Reports - Market Reaction, Audit Fee and Corporate Governance Quality

Keren Bar-Hava

doi:doi:10.11648/j.jfa.20210906.15

| Peer-Reviewed

Switching to Semi-annual Financial Statement Reports - Market Reaction, Audit Fee and Corporate Governance Quality

Keren Bar-Hava

Published in Journal of Finance and Accounting (Volume 9, Issue 6)

Received: 25 October 2021 Accepted: 15 November 2021 Published: 23 November 2021

Views: Downloads:

Download PDF

Share This Article

Twitter
Linked In
Facebook

Abstract

The aim of the research is to examine the reaction of market participants (investors and firms) to a regulatory exogenous shock of easing financial reporting statement regulations. Since 2017, small cap firms, publicly traded on Tel-Aviv stock exchange, are required to publish only Semi-annual reports hence any firm may opt to switch from formerly mandatory quarterly reporting to the currently required semi-annual financial reporting statement. We show that 2/3 of the firms chose to adopt the relief in regulation. In the group of firms that chose to apply the regulation relief, we find a significant negative abnormal market reaction of -2% to the announcement of adopting the relief. In the group of firms that waive the regulation relief and chose to stay on quarterly reporting, we observe a significant positive abnormal market reaction of +2.5% to the announcement of voluntary continuing with the quarterly financial reports. Moreover, for the firms that switch to semi-annual reports, we show a significant decrease of 19.8% in the number of external auditing hours and a significant decrease of 16% in the annual external total audit fee in 2017 as compared to 2016. No significant change in the annual external total audit fee has been observed for the firms that opted not to adopt the abovementioned regulation. We also collect additional information about institutional investor holdings and outside directors which serves on these boards (financial expertise, gender and "busyness") as signals to corporate governance quality. We find positive and significant associations between the voluntarily continue the quarterly financial reporting and high quality corporate governance. The findings of the event study provide a valuable contribution to the ongoing debate on the relevance of the quarterly financial reports to investors. The additional finding of lower corporate governance quality and decreased external audit effort which characterized the firms that adopt the relief represent an increased risk for information asymmetry for investors in such firms thus further reinforces the importance of frequent financial reporting.

Published in	Journal of Finance and Accounting (Volume 9, Issue 6)
DOI	10.11648/j.jfa.20210906.15
Page(s)	249-257
Creative Commons	This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright	Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Financial Reports, Relevance, Market Reaction, Corporate Governance, Audit Fee, Semi-annual, Quarterly

References

[1]	Bar-Hava K., Gu F., and Lev B., 2020, Market Evidence on Investor Preference for Fewer Directorships, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Vol. 55, No. 3, pp. 931_954.
[2]	Beaver, W. McNichols, and Wang Z., 2018, The Information Content of Earnings Announcements: New Insights from Intertemporal and Cross-Sectional Behavior, Review of Accounting Studies, Vol. 23, Issue 1, Pages 95-135.
[3]	Bhojraj, S., Libby, R., 2005. Capital market pressure, disclosure frequency-induced earnings/cash flow conflict, and managerial myopia. The Accounting Review 80, 1-20.
[4]	Botosan, C., 1997, Disclosure level and the cost of equity capital, The Accounting Review, Vol. 72 (3): 323.
[5]	Botosan, C. and M. Plumlee, 2002, A re-examination of disclosure level and the expected cost of equity capital, Journal of Accounting Research, Vol. 40 (1): 21.
[6]	Castro, W. B. L., Peleias, R. I., & da Silva, G. P., 2015. Determinants of Audit Fees: a Study in the Companies Listed on the BM & FBOVESPA, Brazil, R. Cont. Fin. – USP, São Paulo, 26 (69), 261-273.
[7]	Charitou, A., Floropoulos, N., Karamanou, I., and Loizides, G., 2018, Non-GAAP earnings disclosures on the face of the income statement by UK firms: The effect on market liquidity. International Journal of Accounting, Vol. 53, 183–202.
[8]	Dye, R., 1985, Disclosure of Nonproprietary Information, Journal of Accounting Research, Vol. 23 (1), pp. 123–45.
[9]	Einhorn, E., 2007, Voluntary disclosure under uncertainty about the reporting objective. Journal of Accounting and Economics 43, 245-274.
[10]	Ernstberger, J., Link, B., Stich, M., and Vogler, O., 2017, The Real Effects of Mandatory Quarterly Reporting, The Accounting Review: September 2017, Vol. 92 (5), pp. 33-60.
[11]	Francis, J., 1984. The effect of audit firm size on audit prices: A study of the Australian market. Journal of Accounting and Economics 6 (2): 133-51.
[12]	Fu, R., Kraft, A. and Zhang, H., 2012, Financial reporting frequency, information asymmetry, and the cost of equity. Journal of Accounting and Economics, Vol., 54 (2-3), 132–149.
[13]	Gigler, C. Kanodia, H. Sapra, and R. Venugopalan., 2014. How frequent financial reporting causes managerial short-termism: An analysis of the costs and benefits of reporting frequency. Journal of Accounting Research, Vol. 52, No. 2, pp. 357-387.
[14]	Healy P. M., Palepu K. G., 1993, The effect of firms’ financial disclosure strategies on stock price, Accounting Horizons, vol. 7 (1) pp. 1-11.
[15]	Holland J., (1998), Private voluntary disclosure, financial intermediation and market efficiency, Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, vol. 25, nr. 1, 1998, p. 29-68.
[16]	Huang, Q. Y., & Skantz, T. R., 2016, The informativeness of pro forma and street earnings: An examination of information asymmetry around earnings announcements. Review of Accounting Studies, 2, 198–250.
[17]	Lev, B. and Gu, F., 2016. The end of accounting and the path forward for investors and managers. John Wiley & Sons. Li, Y. and Lang, L., 2014, June.
[18]	Lev, B., 2018. "The deteriorating usefulness of financial report information and how to reverse it," Accounting and Business Research, vol. 48 (5), pages 465-493.
[19]	Lokman, N, Cotter, J and Mula, J., 2011, 'Corporate governance quality, incentive factors and voluntary corporate governance disclosures in annual reports of Malaysian Publicly Listed Companies', Paper Under Review for Journal of Contemporary Accounting and Economics Thesis.
[20]	Lundholm, R. and L. Myers, 2002, Bringing the future forward: The effect of disclosure on the returnsearnings relation, Journal of Accounting Research, Vol. 40 (3): 809.
[21]	Malone D., Fries C. i Jones T., 1993, An empirical investigation of the extent of corporate financial disclosure in the oil and gas industry, Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance, vol. 8, no. 3, p. 249-275.
[22]	Kajüter, P., Klassmann F., Nienhaus, M., 2018. The Effect of Mandatory Quarterly Reporting on Firm Value. The Accounting Review, Vol. 94, No. 3, pp. 251-277.
[23]	Petersen, C. and T. Plenborg, 2006, Voluntary disclosure and information asymmetry in Denmark. Journal of International Accounting Auditing & Taxation, Vol. 15 (2): 127.
[24]	Sengupta, P., 1998, corporate disclosure quality and the cost of debt, The Accounting Review, Vol. 73 (4): 459.
[25]	Singhvi, S. S., & Desai, H. B. (1971). An empirical analysis of the quality of corporate financial disclosure. The Accounting Review, 46 (1), 129-138.
[26]	Verrecchia, Robert E. 1983. “Discretionary Disclosure.” Journal of Accounting and Economics 5 (3): 179–94.

Cite This Article

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Keren Bar-Hava. (2021). Switching to Semi-annual Financial Statement Reports - Market Reaction, Audit Fee and Corporate Governance Quality. Journal of Finance and Accounting, 9(6), 249-257. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jfa.20210906.15

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Keren Bar-Hava. Switching to Semi-annual Financial Statement Reports - Market Reaction, Audit Fee and Corporate Governance Quality. J. Finance Account. 2021, 9(6), 249-257. doi: 10.11648/j.jfa.20210906.15

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Keren Bar-Hava. Switching to Semi-annual Financial Statement Reports - Market Reaction, Audit Fee and Corporate Governance Quality. J Finance Account. 2021;9(6):249-257. doi: 10.11648/j.jfa.20210906.15

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.jfa.20210906.15,
  author = {Keren Bar-Hava},
  title = {Switching to Semi-annual Financial Statement Reports - Market Reaction, Audit Fee and Corporate Governance Quality},
  journal = {Journal of Finance and Accounting},
  volume = {9},
  number = {6},
  pages = {249-257},
  doi = {10.11648/j.jfa.20210906.15},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jfa.20210906.15},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.jfa.20210906.15},
  abstract = {The aim of the research is to examine the reaction of market participants (investors and firms) to a regulatory exogenous shock of easing financial reporting statement regulations. Since 2017, small cap firms, publicly traded on Tel-Aviv stock exchange, are required to publish only Semi-annual reports hence any firm may opt to switch from formerly mandatory quarterly reporting to the currently required semi-annual financial reporting statement. We show that 2/3 of the firms chose to adopt the relief in regulation. In the group of firms that chose to apply the regulation relief, we find a significant negative abnormal market reaction of -2% to the announcement of adopting the relief. In the group of firms that waive the regulation relief and chose to stay on quarterly reporting, we observe a significant positive abnormal market reaction of +2.5% to the announcement of voluntary continuing with the quarterly financial reports. Moreover, for the firms that switch to semi-annual reports, we show a significant decrease of 19.8% in the number of external auditing hours and a significant decrease of 16% in the annual external total audit fee in 2017 as compared to 2016. No significant change in the annual external total audit fee has been observed for the firms that opted not to adopt the abovementioned regulation. We also collect additional information about institutional investor holdings and outside directors which serves on these boards (financial expertise, gender and "busyness") as signals to corporate governance quality. We find positive and significant associations between the voluntarily continue the quarterly financial reporting and high quality corporate governance. The findings of the event study provide a valuable contribution to the ongoing debate on the relevance of the quarterly financial reports to investors. The additional finding of lower corporate governance quality and decreased external audit effort which characterized the firms that adopt the relief represent an increased risk for information asymmetry for investors in such firms thus further reinforces the importance of frequent financial reporting.},
 year = {2021}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Switching to Semi-annual Financial Statement Reports - Market Reaction, Audit Fee and Corporate Governance Quality
AU  - Keren Bar-Hava
Y1  - 2021/11/23
PY  - 2021
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jfa.20210906.15
DO  - 10.11648/j.jfa.20210906.15
T2  - Journal of Finance and Accounting
JF  - Journal of Finance and Accounting
JO  - Journal of Finance and Accounting
SP  - 249
EP  - 257
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2330-7323
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jfa.20210906.15
AB  - The aim of the research is to examine the reaction of market participants (investors and firms) to a regulatory exogenous shock of easing financial reporting statement regulations. Since 2017, small cap firms, publicly traded on Tel-Aviv stock exchange, are required to publish only Semi-annual reports hence any firm may opt to switch from formerly mandatory quarterly reporting to the currently required semi-annual financial reporting statement. We show that 2/3 of the firms chose to adopt the relief in regulation. In the group of firms that chose to apply the regulation relief, we find a significant negative abnormal market reaction of -2% to the announcement of adopting the relief. In the group of firms that waive the regulation relief and chose to stay on quarterly reporting, we observe a significant positive abnormal market reaction of +2.5% to the announcement of voluntary continuing with the quarterly financial reports. Moreover, for the firms that switch to semi-annual reports, we show a significant decrease of 19.8% in the number of external auditing hours and a significant decrease of 16% in the annual external total audit fee in 2017 as compared to 2016. No significant change in the annual external total audit fee has been observed for the firms that opted not to adopt the abovementioned regulation. We also collect additional information about institutional investor holdings and outside directors which serves on these boards (financial expertise, gender and "busyness") as signals to corporate governance quality. We find positive and significant associations between the voluntarily continue the quarterly financial reporting and high quality corporate governance. The findings of the event study provide a valuable contribution to the ongoing debate on the relevance of the quarterly financial reports to investors. The additional finding of lower corporate governance quality and decreased external audit effort which characterized the firms that adopt the relief represent an increased risk for information asymmetry for investors in such firms thus further reinforces the importance of frequent financial reporting.
VL  - 9
IS  - 6
ER  -

Copy | Download

Author Information

Keren Bar-Hava

The School of Business Administration, the Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel

Download PDF

Sections

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Keren Bar-Hava. (2021). Switching to Semi-annual Financial Statement Reports - Market Reaction, Audit Fee and Corporate Governance Quality. Journal of Finance and Accounting, 9(6), 249-257. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jfa.20210906.15

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Keren Bar-Hava. Switching to Semi-annual Financial Statement Reports - Market Reaction, Audit Fee and Corporate Governance Quality. J. Finance Account. 2021, 9(6), 249-257. doi: 10.11648/j.jfa.20210906.15

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Keren Bar-Hava. Switching to Semi-annual Financial Statement Reports - Market Reaction, Audit Fee and Corporate Governance Quality. J Finance Account. 2021;9(6):249-257. doi: 10.11648/j.jfa.20210906.15

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.jfa.20210906.15,
  author = {Keren Bar-Hava},
  title = {Switching to Semi-annual Financial Statement Reports - Market Reaction, Audit Fee and Corporate Governance Quality},
  journal = {Journal of Finance and Accounting},
  volume = {9},
  number = {6},
  pages = {249-257},
  doi = {10.11648/j.jfa.20210906.15},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jfa.20210906.15},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.jfa.20210906.15},
  abstract = {The aim of the research is to examine the reaction of market participants (investors and firms) to a regulatory exogenous shock of easing financial reporting statement regulations. Since 2017, small cap firms, publicly traded on Tel-Aviv stock exchange, are required to publish only Semi-annual reports hence any firm may opt to switch from formerly mandatory quarterly reporting to the currently required semi-annual financial reporting statement. We show that 2/3 of the firms chose to adopt the relief in regulation. In the group of firms that chose to apply the regulation relief, we find a significant negative abnormal market reaction of -2% to the announcement of adopting the relief. In the group of firms that waive the regulation relief and chose to stay on quarterly reporting, we observe a significant positive abnormal market reaction of +2.5% to the announcement of voluntary continuing with the quarterly financial reports. Moreover, for the firms that switch to semi-annual reports, we show a significant decrease of 19.8% in the number of external auditing hours and a significant decrease of 16% in the annual external total audit fee in 2017 as compared to 2016. No significant change in the annual external total audit fee has been observed for the firms that opted not to adopt the abovementioned regulation. We also collect additional information about institutional investor holdings and outside directors which serves on these boards (financial expertise, gender and "busyness") as signals to corporate governance quality. We find positive and significant associations between the voluntarily continue the quarterly financial reporting and high quality corporate governance. The findings of the event study provide a valuable contribution to the ongoing debate on the relevance of the quarterly financial reports to investors. The additional finding of lower corporate governance quality and decreased external audit effort which characterized the firms that adopt the relief represent an increased risk for information asymmetry for investors in such firms thus further reinforces the importance of frequent financial reporting.},
 year = {2021}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Switching to Semi-annual Financial Statement Reports - Market Reaction, Audit Fee and Corporate Governance Quality
AU  - Keren Bar-Hava
Y1  - 2021/11/23
PY  - 2021
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jfa.20210906.15
DO  - 10.11648/j.jfa.20210906.15
T2  - Journal of Finance and Accounting
JF  - Journal of Finance and Accounting
JO  - Journal of Finance and Accounting
SP  - 249
EP  - 257
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2330-7323
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jfa.20210906.15
AB  - The aim of the research is to examine the reaction of market participants (investors and firms) to a regulatory exogenous shock of easing financial reporting statement regulations. Since 2017, small cap firms, publicly traded on Tel-Aviv stock exchange, are required to publish only Semi-annual reports hence any firm may opt to switch from formerly mandatory quarterly reporting to the currently required semi-annual financial reporting statement. We show that 2/3 of the firms chose to adopt the relief in regulation. In the group of firms that chose to apply the regulation relief, we find a significant negative abnormal market reaction of -2% to the announcement of adopting the relief. In the group of firms that waive the regulation relief and chose to stay on quarterly reporting, we observe a significant positive abnormal market reaction of +2.5% to the announcement of voluntary continuing with the quarterly financial reports. Moreover, for the firms that switch to semi-annual reports, we show a significant decrease of 19.8% in the number of external auditing hours and a significant decrease of 16% in the annual external total audit fee in 2017 as compared to 2016. No significant change in the annual external total audit fee has been observed for the firms that opted not to adopt the abovementioned regulation. We also collect additional information about institutional investor holdings and outside directors which serves on these boards (financial expertise, gender and "busyness") as signals to corporate governance quality. We find positive and significant associations between the voluntarily continue the quarterly financial reporting and high quality corporate governance. The findings of the event study provide a valuable contribution to the ongoing debate on the relevance of the quarterly financial reports to investors. The additional finding of lower corporate governance quality and decreased external audit effort which characterized the firms that adopt the relief represent an increased risk for information asymmetry for investors in such firms thus further reinforces the importance of frequent financial reporting.
VL  - 9
IS  - 6
ER  -

Copy | Download