Comparative Study of Metacognitive Scaffolds at Home and Abroad in Intelligent Learning Environment

Mengdan Ma

doi:doi:10.11648/j.si.20221006.16

| Peer-Reviewed

Comparative Study of Metacognitive Scaffolds at Home and Abroad in Intelligent Learning Environment

Mengdan Ma

Published in Science Innovation (Volume 10, Issue 6)

Received: 13 November 2022 Accepted: 22 December 2022 Published: 28 December 2022

Views: Downloads:

Download PDF

Share This Article

Twitter
Linked In
Facebook

Abstract

The design of metacognitive scaffolding in intelligent learning environment helps learners to manage their own thinking. In this study, 36 experimental studies on the influence of metacognitive scaffolds on learning effect in intelligent learning environment at home and abroad in the past eleven years were chosen to sort out and analyze. The author constructs the coding and analysis framework from the aspects of experimental object, experimental environment, metacognitive scaffold type and research topic. The results show that the research objects are mainly middle school students and college students. There are great differences in the research environment at home and abroad. In China, network teaching platform is the main teaching platform, while in foreign countries, more intelligent learning guide system is preferred. Metacognitive scaffolds have developed from fixed scaffolds to adaptive scaffolds. In the field of research, monitoring and control interact dynamically in the field of metacognitive skills, and monitoring may trigger the control process. With the deep integration of artificial intelligence and education, learner behavior and emotion data will help researchers use metacognitive scaffolding to more accurately intervene in the learning process. Based on this, the following suggestions are put forward to promote the development of metacognitive scaffolds in China, including long-term intervention by teachers to promote the development of students' metacognitive ability, systematic promotion of the development of metacognitive scaffolds in intelligent learning environment, and strengthening the exploration of learners' emotional experience process.

Published in	Science Innovation (Volume 10, Issue 6)
DOI	10.11648/j.si.20221006.16
Page(s)	214-220
Creative Commons	This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright	Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Metacognitive Scaffold, Intelligent Learning Environment, Metacognition, Empirical Research

References

[1]	Flavell J H. First Discussant's Comments: What is Memory Development the Development of? [J]. Human Development, 1971, 14 (4): 272-278.
[2]	Sternberg R J. Encyclopedia of Human Intelligence [G]. Macmillan Publishing House, 1994.
[3]	L B, L B A. Metacognitive skills and reading [C]. New York: Longman: 1984.
[4]	Hill J R, Hannafin M J. Teaching and learning in digital environments: The resurgence of resource-based learning [J]. Educational Technology Research and Development, 2001, 49 (3): 37-52.
[5]	Sharma P, Hannafin M J. Scaffolding in technology-enhanced learning environments [J]. INTERACTIVE LEARNING ENVIRONMENTS, 2007, 15 (1): 27-46.
[6]	Davis E A. Scaffolding students' knowledge integration: prompts for reflection in KIE [J]. International Journal of Science Education, 2010, 22 (8): 819-837.
[7]	Azevedo R, Moos D C, Greene J A, et al. Why is externally-facilitated regulated learning more effective than self-regulated learning with hypermedia? [J]. ETR&D-EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT, 2008, 56 (1): 45-72.
[8]	Azevedo R, Hadwin A F. Scaffolding Self-regulated Learning and Metacognition – Implications for the Design of Computer-based Scaffolds [J]. Instructional Science, 2005, 33 (5-6): 367-379.
[9]	Devolder A, van Braak J, Tondeur J. Supporting self-regulated learning in computer-based learning environments: systematic review of effects of scaffolding in the domain of science education [J]. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 2012, 28 (6): 557-573.
[10]	Segedy J R, Gautam B, Sulcer B. A Model-Based Behavior Analysis Approach for Open-Ended Environments [J]. Educational Technology & Society, 2014, 1 (17): 272-282.
[11]	Azevedo R, Cromley J G, Winters F I, et al. Adaptive Human Scaffolding Facilitates Adolescents’ Self-regulated Learning with Hypermedia [J]. Instructional Science, 2005, 33 (5): 381-412.
[12]	李士平, 赵蔚, 刘红霞, 等. 数据表征元认知: 基于学习分析的网络自主学习行为研究 [J]. 电化教育研究, 2017, 38 (03): 41-47.
[13]	张屹, 陈珍, 白清玉, 等. 基于移动终端的PBL教学对小学生元认知能力的影响研究——以小学科学课程“地球的运动”为例 [J]. 中国电化教育, 2017 (07): 79-87.
[14]	Molenaar I, Sleegers P, van Boxtel C. Metacognitive scaffolding during collaborative learning: a promising combination [J]. Metacognition and Learning, 2014, 9 (3): 309-332.
[15]	Bulu S T, Pedersen S. Supporting problem-solving performance in a hypermedia learning environment: The role of students’ prior knowledge and metacognitive skills [J]. Computers in Human Behavior, 2012, 28 (4): 1162-1169.
[16]	Flavell J H. Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive–developmental inquiry [J]. American psychologist, 1979, 10 (34): 906.
[17]	Nelson T O. Metacognition: core readings [M]. Boston: Allyn and Bacon, 1992.
[18]	Mayer R E, Alexander P A. Handbook of research on learning and instruction [M]. New York: Routledge, 2011.
[19]	Pieger E, Bannert M. Differential effects of students' self-directed metacognitive prompts [J]. Computers in Human Behavior, 2018, 86: 165-173.
[20]	Winne P H, Hadwin A F. Studying as self-regulated learning [C]. Mahwah NJ: Erlbaum, 1998.
[21]	Hsu Y, Wang C, Zhang W. Supporting technology-enhanced inquiry through metacognitive and cognitive prompts: Sequential analysis of metacognitive actions in response to mixed prompts [J]. Computers in Human Behavior, 2017, 72: 701-712.
[22]	董奇. 论元认知 [J]. 北京师范大学学报, 1989 (01): 68-74.
[23]	Molenaar I, Chiu M M, Sleegers P, et al. Scaffolding of small groups' metacognitive activities with an avatar. [J]. International journal of computer-supported collaborative learning, 2011, 6 (4): 601-624.
[24]	D Mello S, Graesser A. Dynamics of affective states during complex learning [J]. Learning and Instruction, 2012, 22 (2): 145-157.
[25]	Zhang Y, Paquette L, Baker R S, et al. Can Strategic Behaviour Facilitate Confusion Resolution? The Interplay Between Confusion and Metacognitive Strategies in Betty’s Brain [J]. Journal of Learning Analytics, 2021, 8 (3): 28-44.

Cite This Article

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Mengdan Ma. (2022). Comparative Study of Metacognitive Scaffolds at Home and Abroad in Intelligent Learning Environment. Science Innovation, 10(6), 214-220. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.si.20221006.16

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Mengdan Ma. Comparative Study of Metacognitive Scaffolds at Home and Abroad in Intelligent Learning Environment. Sci. Innov. 2022, 10(6), 214-220. doi: 10.11648/j.si.20221006.16

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Mengdan Ma. Comparative Study of Metacognitive Scaffolds at Home and Abroad in Intelligent Learning Environment. Sci Innov. 2022;10(6):214-220. doi: 10.11648/j.si.20221006.16

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.si.20221006.16,
  author = {Mengdan Ma},
  title = {Comparative Study of Metacognitive Scaffolds at Home and Abroad in Intelligent Learning Environment},
  journal = {Science Innovation},
  volume = {10},
  number = {6},
  pages = {214-220},
  doi = {10.11648/j.si.20221006.16},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.si.20221006.16},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.si.20221006.16},
  abstract = {The design of metacognitive scaffolding in intelligent learning environment helps learners to manage their own thinking. In this study, 36 experimental studies on the influence of metacognitive scaffolds on learning effect in intelligent learning environment at home and abroad in the past eleven years were chosen to sort out and analyze. The author constructs the coding and analysis framework from the aspects of experimental object, experimental environment, metacognitive scaffold type and research topic. The results show that the research objects are mainly middle school students and college students. There are great differences in the research environment at home and abroad. In China, network teaching platform is the main teaching platform, while in foreign countries, more intelligent learning guide system is preferred. Metacognitive scaffolds have developed from fixed scaffolds to adaptive scaffolds. In the field of research, monitoring and control interact dynamically in the field of metacognitive skills, and monitoring may trigger the control process. With the deep integration of artificial intelligence and education, learner behavior and emotion data will help researchers use metacognitive scaffolding to more accurately intervene in the learning process. Based on this, the following suggestions are put forward to promote the development of metacognitive scaffolds in China, including long-term intervention by teachers to promote the development of students' metacognitive ability, systematic promotion of the development of metacognitive scaffolds in intelligent learning environment, and strengthening the exploration of learners' emotional experience process.},
 year = {2022}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Comparative Study of Metacognitive Scaffolds at Home and Abroad in Intelligent Learning Environment
AU  - Mengdan Ma
Y1  - 2022/12/28
PY  - 2022
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.si.20221006.16
DO  - 10.11648/j.si.20221006.16
T2  - Science Innovation
JF  - Science Innovation
JO  - Science Innovation
SP  - 214
EP  - 220
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2328-787X
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.si.20221006.16
AB  - The design of metacognitive scaffolding in intelligent learning environment helps learners to manage their own thinking. In this study, 36 experimental studies on the influence of metacognitive scaffolds on learning effect in intelligent learning environment at home and abroad in the past eleven years were chosen to sort out and analyze. The author constructs the coding and analysis framework from the aspects of experimental object, experimental environment, metacognitive scaffold type and research topic. The results show that the research objects are mainly middle school students and college students. There are great differences in the research environment at home and abroad. In China, network teaching platform is the main teaching platform, while in foreign countries, more intelligent learning guide system is preferred. Metacognitive scaffolds have developed from fixed scaffolds to adaptive scaffolds. In the field of research, monitoring and control interact dynamically in the field of metacognitive skills, and monitoring may trigger the control process. With the deep integration of artificial intelligence and education, learner behavior and emotion data will help researchers use metacognitive scaffolding to more accurately intervene in the learning process. Based on this, the following suggestions are put forward to promote the development of metacognitive scaffolds in China, including long-term intervention by teachers to promote the development of students' metacognitive ability, systematic promotion of the development of metacognitive scaffolds in intelligent learning environment, and strengthening the exploration of learners' emotional experience process.
VL  - 10
IS  - 6
ER  -

Copy | Download

Author Information

Mengdan Ma

School of Network Education, Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Beijing, China

Download PDF

Sections

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Mengdan Ma. (2022). Comparative Study of Metacognitive Scaffolds at Home and Abroad in Intelligent Learning Environment. Science Innovation, 10(6), 214-220. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.si.20221006.16

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Mengdan Ma. Comparative Study of Metacognitive Scaffolds at Home and Abroad in Intelligent Learning Environment. Sci. Innov. 2022, 10(6), 214-220. doi: 10.11648/j.si.20221006.16

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Mengdan Ma. Comparative Study of Metacognitive Scaffolds at Home and Abroad in Intelligent Learning Environment. Sci Innov. 2022;10(6):214-220. doi: 10.11648/j.si.20221006.16

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.si.20221006.16,
  author = {Mengdan Ma},
  title = {Comparative Study of Metacognitive Scaffolds at Home and Abroad in Intelligent Learning Environment},
  journal = {Science Innovation},
  volume = {10},
  number = {6},
  pages = {214-220},
  doi = {10.11648/j.si.20221006.16},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.si.20221006.16},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.si.20221006.16},
  abstract = {The design of metacognitive scaffolding in intelligent learning environment helps learners to manage their own thinking. In this study, 36 experimental studies on the influence of metacognitive scaffolds on learning effect in intelligent learning environment at home and abroad in the past eleven years were chosen to sort out and analyze. The author constructs the coding and analysis framework from the aspects of experimental object, experimental environment, metacognitive scaffold type and research topic. The results show that the research objects are mainly middle school students and college students. There are great differences in the research environment at home and abroad. In China, network teaching platform is the main teaching platform, while in foreign countries, more intelligent learning guide system is preferred. Metacognitive scaffolds have developed from fixed scaffolds to adaptive scaffolds. In the field of research, monitoring and control interact dynamically in the field of metacognitive skills, and monitoring may trigger the control process. With the deep integration of artificial intelligence and education, learner behavior and emotion data will help researchers use metacognitive scaffolding to more accurately intervene in the learning process. Based on this, the following suggestions are put forward to promote the development of metacognitive scaffolds in China, including long-term intervention by teachers to promote the development of students' metacognitive ability, systematic promotion of the development of metacognitive scaffolds in intelligent learning environment, and strengthening the exploration of learners' emotional experience process.},
 year = {2022}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Comparative Study of Metacognitive Scaffolds at Home and Abroad in Intelligent Learning Environment
AU  - Mengdan Ma
Y1  - 2022/12/28
PY  - 2022
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.si.20221006.16
DO  - 10.11648/j.si.20221006.16
T2  - Science Innovation
JF  - Science Innovation
JO  - Science Innovation
SP  - 214
EP  - 220
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2328-787X
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.si.20221006.16
AB  - The design of metacognitive scaffolding in intelligent learning environment helps learners to manage their own thinking. In this study, 36 experimental studies on the influence of metacognitive scaffolds on learning effect in intelligent learning environment at home and abroad in the past eleven years were chosen to sort out and analyze. The author constructs the coding and analysis framework from the aspects of experimental object, experimental environment, metacognitive scaffold type and research topic. The results show that the research objects are mainly middle school students and college students. There are great differences in the research environment at home and abroad. In China, network teaching platform is the main teaching platform, while in foreign countries, more intelligent learning guide system is preferred. Metacognitive scaffolds have developed from fixed scaffolds to adaptive scaffolds. In the field of research, monitoring and control interact dynamically in the field of metacognitive skills, and monitoring may trigger the control process. With the deep integration of artificial intelligence and education, learner behavior and emotion data will help researchers use metacognitive scaffolding to more accurately intervene in the learning process. Based on this, the following suggestions are put forward to promote the development of metacognitive scaffolds in China, including long-term intervention by teachers to promote the development of students' metacognitive ability, systematic promotion of the development of metacognitive scaffolds in intelligent learning environment, and strengthening the exploration of learners' emotional experience process.
VL  - 10
IS  - 6
ER  -

Copy | Download