Graffiti and Discursive Legitimacy: The Politics of Spatiality and Agency in Teachers’ Attitudes Towards Student Graffiti in Zimbabwean High Schools

Hugh Mangeya

doi:doi:10.11648/j.sjedu.20221001.13

| Peer-Reviewed

Graffiti and Discursive Legitimacy: The Politics of Spatiality and Agency in Teachers’ Attitudes Towards Student Graffiti in Zimbabwean High Schools

Hugh Mangeya

Published in Science Journal of Education (Volume 10, Issue 1)

Received: 3 January 2022 Accepted: 18 January 2022 Published: 9 February 2022

Views: Downloads:

Download PDF

Share This Article

Twitter
Linked In
Facebook

Abstract

The article explores how issues of spatiality and agency are implicated in the construction of teachers’ attitudes on the occurrence of graffiti within the Zimbabwe school system. Graffiti is an important third space in the education system that is, however, negatively conceptualised by both the teaching staff and school authorities, alike. Teachers are a crucial cog in the total education process who have the mandate to determine the range of spaces on which ‘legitimate’ discoursing and learning can take place. Teachers’ attitudes on the presence of graffiti on the school premises are mainly shaped by their perception of (1) the toilet as a discursive space and (2) the nature of the graffiti writers who are mainly perceived as (i) hailing from the ghetto (ii) intellectually and mentally challenged. Data was collected from interviews held with high school teachers in Gweru district. Analysis of the data is couched in Deetz’ theorisation of discursive closure. Analysis of the graffiti texts reveals that, in spite of its many positive contributions to educational institutions, teachers mainly attribute the presence of graffiti in the school to ‘slow learners’, students who come from the ghetto and single/absent parent backgrounds. This is further compounded by its main association with the toilet, which is a space that no ‘sane’ student is supposed to interact on.

Published in	Science Journal of Education (Volume 10, Issue 1)
DOI	10.11648/j.sjedu.20221001.13
Page(s)	18-27
Creative Commons	This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright	Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Graffiti, Discursive Legitimacy, Spatiality, Agency, Teachers’ Attitudes

References

[1]	Aluede, O., Ojugo, A. I., and Okoza, J. (2012) Emotional Abuse of Secondary School Students by Teachers in Edo State. Research in Education, 88 (1): 29-41.
[2]	Brighenti, A. M. (2010). At the Wall: Graffiti Writers, Urban Territoriality, and the Public Domain. Space and Culture, 13 (3), 315–332.
[3]	Buendia, E. and Ares, N. (2004) Geographies of Differences: The Social Production of the East Side, West Side and Central City School. New York. Peter Lang.
[4]	Chmielewska E. (2007) Framing [Con]text: Graffiti and Place. Space and Culture, 10 (2), 145-169.
[5]	Cresswell, T. (2006) Place: A short introduction. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
[6]	Creswell, T. (1996) In Place/Out of Place: Geography, Ideology and Transgression. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
[7]	Constaneda, E. (2012) Places of Stigma: Ghettos, Barrios and Banliues. In Hutchison, R. and Haynes, B. D. (eds) The Ghetto: Contemporary Global Issues and Controversies (pp 159-190). Philadelphia: Westview Press.
[8]	Deetz, S. (1992) Democracy in the Age of Corporate Colonisation Developments in Communication and the Politics of Everyday Life. Albany: State University of New York.
[9]	Fazlagic, A. (2005) Measuring the intellectual capital of a university. Paper delivered at the Trends in The Management of Human Resources in Higher Education. Paris, 25-26 August 2005. Accessed from http://www.oecd.org/education/imhe/35322785.pdf.
[10]	Ginsburg, F. (1994) Embedded aesthetics: creating discursive spaces for indigenous media. Cultural Anthropology, 9 (2): 365-382.
[11]	Foucault, M. (1978/1991) Governmentality. In G. Burchell, C. Gordon, & P. Miller (Eds.), The Foucault effect. Studies in governmentality (pp. 87-104). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
[12]	Hauge, A. L. (2007) Identity and place: a critical comparison of three identity theories. Architectural Science Review, 1-15.
[13]	Habermas, J. (1989), The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society (trans. T. Burger with the assistance of F. Lawrence), Cambridge: Polity Press.
[14]	Hughey, M. (2011) Backstage discourses and the reproduction of white masculinities. The Sociological Quarterly, 52: 132-153.
[15]	Islam, G. (2008) Backstage Discourse and the Emergence of Organizational Voices: Exploring Graffiti and Organization. Insper Working Paper, WPE: 141/2008. Accessed from https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/6228777.pdf.
[16]	Islam, G. (2010) Backstage discourses and the emergence of organisational voices: exploring graffiti and organisation. Journal of Management Inquirym, 19 (3) 246-260.
[17]	Lavresheva, O. (2013) Discursive legitimation strategies in the media: case study of the UK retail planning policy. Master Thesis, Department of Marketing. Aato University.
[18]	Mangeya, H. (2015) Graffiti as an Agent for Effecting Sexual Behavioural Change among Female Students in Zimbabwe’s High Schools (pp 33-47). In Mugari V, Mukaro L and Chabata, E. (eds) Trends in Zimbabwean Linguistics: A Festchrift for Chief Kumbirai Mkanganwi. Harare: University of Zimbabwe Publishers.
[19]	Mangeya, H. (2018) Graffiti as a site for Cultural literacies. International Journal of Cultural Studies, DOI: 10.1177/1367877918788577, pp. 1-15.
[20]	Matavire, M., Mpofu, V. and Maveneka, A. (2013) Streaming Practices and Implications in the Education System: A Survey of Mazowe District, Zimbabwe. Journal of Social Science for Policy Implications, 1 (1): 60-70.
[21]	Nguyen, J. (2017) Bombed Narratives: An investigative analysis of Banksy’s street discourse. Sosland Journal 99-110. https://soslandjournal.files.wordpress.com/2017/07/2017sosland-nguyen.pdf.
[22]	Nwoye, O. G. (1993). Social issues on walls: Graffiti in university lavatories. Discourse & Society, 4 (4), 419-442.
[23]	Ouzman, S. (2010) Graffiti as art (e) fact: A contemporary archaeology. Retrieved from www.uj.ac.za/EN/.../departments/.../Ouzman%202010%20Graffiti.pdf.
[24]	Oxford Reference (n.d.) Spatiality. https://www.oxfordreference.com/view/10.1093/oi/authority.20110803100521647.
[25]	Peter, M. (1997) The Enclave, the Citadel and the Ghetto. Urban Affairs Review, 33 (2): 228-264.
[26]	Petersen D. 2015. Maintaining legitimacy as a criticised institution: How Swedish TWAs discursively defend themselves against criticism. Masters Thesis. Gothenburg University.
[27]	Shumba, A. (2002) The Nature, Extent and Effects of Emotional Abuse on Primary School Pupils by Teachers in Zimbabwe. Child Abuse and Neglect, 26: 783-791.
[28]	Suliman, N. (2014) Critical Conceptions of Graffiti in Schools. MPhil Thesis, Graduate Department of Curriculum, Teaching and Learning. University of Toronto. https://tspace.library.utoronto.ca/bitstream/1807/67865/1/Suliman_Naushaad_201406_MA_thesis.pdf.
[29]	Tagwirei, C. and Mangeya, H. (2013) ‘Juvenile’ Toilet Door Posting: An expression of gendered views on sex and sexuality. In Khamasi WJ, Longman C and van Haegendoren M (eds) Gender, Sexuality and the Media. A Question of Accountability? Eldoret: Moi University Press, pp. 27-42.
[30]	Van der Horst, E. (2016) Discursive legitimation: the influence of organisational and product aspects on the discursive legitimation practices of mHealth vendors. Master Thesis, Department of Innovation, Environmental and Energy Sciences. Utrecht University.
[31]	Williamson, A. and DeSouza, R. (2002) Creating online discursive spaces that legitimate alternative ways of knowing. Paper delivered at the Australian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education (ASCILITE) 2002 Annual Conference. Retrieved from http://www.ascilite.org.au/conference/auckland02/proceedings.
[32]	Wilson, N. (2013) Interaction without walls: Analysing leadership discourse through dramaturgy and participation. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 17 (2): 180-199.
[33]	Zieleniec, A. (2016) The right to write the City: Lefebvre and graffiti. Whose right to the city? 10: https://journals.openedition.org/eue/1421.

Cite This Article

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Hugh Mangeya. (2022). Graffiti and Discursive Legitimacy: The Politics of Spatiality and Agency in Teachers’ Attitudes Towards Student Graffiti in Zimbabwean High Schools. Science Journal of Education, 10(1), 18-27. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sjedu.20221001.13

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Hugh Mangeya. Graffiti and Discursive Legitimacy: The Politics of Spatiality and Agency in Teachers’ Attitudes Towards Student Graffiti in Zimbabwean High Schools. Sci. J. Educ. 2022, 10(1), 18-27. doi: 10.11648/j.sjedu.20221001.13

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Hugh Mangeya. Graffiti and Discursive Legitimacy: The Politics of Spatiality and Agency in Teachers’ Attitudes Towards Student Graffiti in Zimbabwean High Schools. Sci J Educ. 2022;10(1):18-27. doi: 10.11648/j.sjedu.20221001.13

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.sjedu.20221001.13,
  author = {Hugh Mangeya},
  title = {Graffiti and Discursive Legitimacy: The Politics of Spatiality and Agency in Teachers’ Attitudes Towards Student Graffiti in Zimbabwean High Schools},
  journal = {Science Journal of Education},
  volume = {10},
  number = {1},
  pages = {18-27},
  doi = {10.11648/j.sjedu.20221001.13},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sjedu.20221001.13},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.sjedu.20221001.13},
  abstract = {The article explores how issues of spatiality and agency are implicated in the construction of teachers’ attitudes on the occurrence of graffiti within the Zimbabwe school system. Graffiti is an important third space in the education system that is, however, negatively conceptualised by both the teaching staff and school authorities, alike. Teachers are a crucial cog in the total education process who have the mandate to determine the range of spaces on which ‘legitimate’ discoursing and learning can take place. Teachers’ attitudes on the presence of graffiti on the school premises are mainly shaped by their perception of (1) the toilet as a discursive space and (2) the nature of the graffiti writers who are mainly perceived as (i) hailing from the ghetto (ii) intellectually and mentally challenged. Data was collected from interviews held with high school teachers in Gweru district. Analysis of the data is couched in Deetz’ theorisation of discursive closure. Analysis of the graffiti texts reveals that, in spite of its many positive contributions to educational institutions, teachers mainly attribute the presence of graffiti in the school to ‘slow learners’, students who come from the ghetto and single/absent parent backgrounds. This is further compounded by its main association with the toilet, which is a space that no ‘sane’ student is supposed to interact on.},
 year = {2022}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Graffiti and Discursive Legitimacy: The Politics of Spatiality and Agency in Teachers’ Attitudes Towards Student Graffiti in Zimbabwean High Schools
AU  - Hugh Mangeya
Y1  - 2022/02/09
PY  - 2022
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sjedu.20221001.13
DO  - 10.11648/j.sjedu.20221001.13
T2  - Science Journal of Education
JF  - Science Journal of Education
JO  - Science Journal of Education
SP  - 18
EP  - 27
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2329-0897
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sjedu.20221001.13
AB  - The article explores how issues of spatiality and agency are implicated in the construction of teachers’ attitudes on the occurrence of graffiti within the Zimbabwe school system. Graffiti is an important third space in the education system that is, however, negatively conceptualised by both the teaching staff and school authorities, alike. Teachers are a crucial cog in the total education process who have the mandate to determine the range of spaces on which ‘legitimate’ discoursing and learning can take place. Teachers’ attitudes on the presence of graffiti on the school premises are mainly shaped by their perception of (1) the toilet as a discursive space and (2) the nature of the graffiti writers who are mainly perceived as (i) hailing from the ghetto (ii) intellectually and mentally challenged. Data was collected from interviews held with high school teachers in Gweru district. Analysis of the data is couched in Deetz’ theorisation of discursive closure. Analysis of the graffiti texts reveals that, in spite of its many positive contributions to educational institutions, teachers mainly attribute the presence of graffiti in the school to ‘slow learners’, students who come from the ghetto and single/absent parent backgrounds. This is further compounded by its main association with the toilet, which is a space that no ‘sane’ student is supposed to interact on.
VL  - 10
IS  - 1
ER  -

Copy | Download

Author Information

Hugh Mangeya

Department of Language, Literature and Cultural Studies, Midlands State University, Zvishavane, Zimbabwe

Download PDF

Sections

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Hugh Mangeya. (2022). Graffiti and Discursive Legitimacy: The Politics of Spatiality and Agency in Teachers’ Attitudes Towards Student Graffiti in Zimbabwean High Schools. Science Journal of Education, 10(1), 18-27. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sjedu.20221001.13

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Hugh Mangeya. Graffiti and Discursive Legitimacy: The Politics of Spatiality and Agency in Teachers’ Attitudes Towards Student Graffiti in Zimbabwean High Schools. Sci. J. Educ. 2022, 10(1), 18-27. doi: 10.11648/j.sjedu.20221001.13

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Hugh Mangeya. Graffiti and Discursive Legitimacy: The Politics of Spatiality and Agency in Teachers’ Attitudes Towards Student Graffiti in Zimbabwean High Schools. Sci J Educ. 2022;10(1):18-27. doi: 10.11648/j.sjedu.20221001.13

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.sjedu.20221001.13,
  author = {Hugh Mangeya},
  title = {Graffiti and Discursive Legitimacy: The Politics of Spatiality and Agency in Teachers’ Attitudes Towards Student Graffiti in Zimbabwean High Schools},
  journal = {Science Journal of Education},
  volume = {10},
  number = {1},
  pages = {18-27},
  doi = {10.11648/j.sjedu.20221001.13},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sjedu.20221001.13},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.sjedu.20221001.13},
  abstract = {The article explores how issues of spatiality and agency are implicated in the construction of teachers’ attitudes on the occurrence of graffiti within the Zimbabwe school system. Graffiti is an important third space in the education system that is, however, negatively conceptualised by both the teaching staff and school authorities, alike. Teachers are a crucial cog in the total education process who have the mandate to determine the range of spaces on which ‘legitimate’ discoursing and learning can take place. Teachers’ attitudes on the presence of graffiti on the school premises are mainly shaped by their perception of (1) the toilet as a discursive space and (2) the nature of the graffiti writers who are mainly perceived as (i) hailing from the ghetto (ii) intellectually and mentally challenged. Data was collected from interviews held with high school teachers in Gweru district. Analysis of the data is couched in Deetz’ theorisation of discursive closure. Analysis of the graffiti texts reveals that, in spite of its many positive contributions to educational institutions, teachers mainly attribute the presence of graffiti in the school to ‘slow learners’, students who come from the ghetto and single/absent parent backgrounds. This is further compounded by its main association with the toilet, which is a space that no ‘sane’ student is supposed to interact on.},
 year = {2022}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Graffiti and Discursive Legitimacy: The Politics of Spatiality and Agency in Teachers’ Attitudes Towards Student Graffiti in Zimbabwean High Schools
AU  - Hugh Mangeya
Y1  - 2022/02/09
PY  - 2022
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sjedu.20221001.13
DO  - 10.11648/j.sjedu.20221001.13
T2  - Science Journal of Education
JF  - Science Journal of Education
JO  - Science Journal of Education
SP  - 18
EP  - 27
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2329-0897
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sjedu.20221001.13
AB  - The article explores how issues of spatiality and agency are implicated in the construction of teachers’ attitudes on the occurrence of graffiti within the Zimbabwe school system. Graffiti is an important third space in the education system that is, however, negatively conceptualised by both the teaching staff and school authorities, alike. Teachers are a crucial cog in the total education process who have the mandate to determine the range of spaces on which ‘legitimate’ discoursing and learning can take place. Teachers’ attitudes on the presence of graffiti on the school premises are mainly shaped by their perception of (1) the toilet as a discursive space and (2) the nature of the graffiti writers who are mainly perceived as (i) hailing from the ghetto (ii) intellectually and mentally challenged. Data was collected from interviews held with high school teachers in Gweru district. Analysis of the data is couched in Deetz’ theorisation of discursive closure. Analysis of the graffiti texts reveals that, in spite of its many positive contributions to educational institutions, teachers mainly attribute the presence of graffiti in the school to ‘slow learners’, students who come from the ghetto and single/absent parent backgrounds. This is further compounded by its main association with the toilet, which is a space that no ‘sane’ student is supposed to interact on.
VL  - 10
IS  - 1
ER  -

Copy | Download